Alison
Adams
Art
& Visual Perception
Elizabeth
Johnston
Long
Blog Post: Readings for 3/14
I
found this article “Motion, emotion, and empathy...” on the
interaction between our emotions and works of art really interesting.
It certainly got me thinking about the way that I react to art and
the feelings that art can provoke and why that happens.
Freedberg
and Gallese say that: “Even
when the image contains no overt emotional component, a sense of
bodily resonance can arise. These are all instances in which
beholders might find themselves automatically simulating the
emotional expression, the movement or even the implied movement
within the representation" (pg. 197). I thought about this
statement for a while and tried to think back to some reactions I've
had to paintings in the past. I don't think that I've ever been aware
of a bodily resonance or physical reaction to a painting but I don't
doubt that its possible.
Freedberg and Gallese also say that:
“When we see the body part of someone else being touched or
caressed or when we see two objects touching each other, our
somatosensory cortices are activated as if our body were subject to
tactile stimulation. Empathetic feels can no longer be regarded as a
matter of simple intuition and can be precisely located in the
relevant areas of the brain that are activated both in the observed
and in the observer.” I often do feel this when looking at movies
or advertisements- that I want to be what doing what I see. And even
Livingstone talked in Chapter 10 about how advertisements are able
to use certain techniques to catch our attention. And this thought
alone with this quote showed me that its really possible to evoke
feelings of empathy and need in others in art if the right techniques are
used.
One
of my favorite quotes from the article was: “We propose that even
the artist’s gestures in producing the art work induce the
empathetic engagement of the observer, by activating simulation of
the motor program that corresponds to the gesture implied by the
trace. The marks on the painting or sculpture are the visible traces
of goal-directed movements; hence, they are capable of activating the
relevant motor areas in the observer’s brain.” The way that they
described the sense of movement we can feel when looking at the
strokes of a Jackson Pollock painting was not something I really took
into account much before I read this. This made me think about my
last long blog post about how art is not about the finished product
and rather about the journey the artist takes to get there. This even
took it one step further in claiming that we gain a sense of movement
by paying close attention to the detail of the skill the artist put
into each stroke. Creating a painting is a “goal-oriented action”
and because of this we think back to how the artist went about
creating that goal. There are so many feelings that art can evoke and
this article showed me that there is so much more to it than just
that.
No comments:
Post a Comment